Presence and Situational Interest of Participants of a Virtual Art Exhibit in the Metaverse: The Case of Galeria Sinag
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between situational interest and spatial presence, as well as the hardware or viewing platform used in observing a virtual art exhibit in the Metaverse. It employed a mixed-methods approach, utilizing correlation analysis and qualitative thematic analysis to understand participant experiences. The study found a positive correlation between situational interest and spatial presence among participants in the virtual space. However, the viewing platform used did not significantly impact spatial presence or situational interest. External environmental factors and limited usage of certain viewing platforms may have influenced the findings. Further research is recommended to comprehensively understand the nuanced effects of viewing platforms on spatial presence. The results of this study encourage designers to focus on creating immersive and realistic virtual exhibits in the Metaverse to motivate students through their heightened situational interest and presence. Insights from this study can guide the development of future virtual exhibits. The study shows how understanding virtual spaces like the Metaverse can shape art experiences. It highlights the potential of Metaverse-based exhibits in providing accessible and immersive cultural engagement, transcending physical limitations. It adds to the evolving knowledge of Metaverse applications, specifically in art displays. It introduces insights into the relationships between situational interest, spatial presence, and viewing platforms, and challenges existing assumptions that can pave the way for further exploration.
Received Date: February 12, 2024
Revised Date: March 15, 2024
Accepted Date: April 26, 2024
References
- Apollonio, F. I., Fantini, F., Garagnani, S., & Gaiani, M. (2021). A Photogrammetry-based workflow for the accurate 3D construction and visualization of museum assets. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030486
- Bouchard, G., Annie G., & Nicole L. (2004). Situational and dispositional coping: An examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress. European Journal of Personality, 18(3), 221–238.
- Carvajal, D. a. L., Morita, M. M., & Bilmes, G. M. (2020). Virtual museums. Captured reality and 3D modeling. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 45, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.013
- Cheng, K.-H. (2022). The structural relationships among spatial presence, situational interest and behavioral attitudes toward online virtual museum navigation: A PLS-SEM analysis. Library Hi Tech, 40(5), 1210–1225. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2021-0301
- Figueroa, R. J. B. (2023). Immersive capability and spatial presence in virtual reality photo-based tours: Implications for distance education. Asia Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(3). https://www.emerald.com/insight/2414-69994.htm
- Figueroa, R. J. B., Gil, F. A. P., & Taniguchi, H. (2022). Piloting virtual reality photo-based tours among students of a Filipino language class: A case of emergency remote teaching in Japan. Avant, 13(2), 1–26. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.01904.pdf
- Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., & Keogh, E. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612
- McCreery, M. P., Schrader, P. G., Krach, S. K., & Boone, R. (2013). A sense of self: The role of presence in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1635–1640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.002
- Mitra, S. (2023). Metaverse: A potential virtual-physical ecosystem for innovative blended education and training. Journal of Metaverse, 3(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1168056
- Moro-Visconti, R. (2022). From physical reality to the Metaverse: A multilayer network valuation. Journal of Metaverse, 2022(2), 1. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2247581
- Nash, E. B., Edwards, G. W., Thompson, J. A., & Barfield, W. (2000). A review of presence and performance in virtual environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 12(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1201_1
- Ochs, C., & Sonderegger, A. (2022). The interplay between presence and learning. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.742509
- Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. (2023). Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8893–8924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
- Portalés, C., Lerma, J. L., & Pérez, C. E. (2009). Photogrammetry and augmented reality for cultural heritage applications. Photogrammetric Record, 24(128), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2009.00549.x
- Shen, R. (2022). Research on the design of the red culture digital exhibition hall based on Metaverse. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(3), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i3.1046
- Učakar, A., Sterle, A., Vuga, M., Pečak, T. T., Trček, D., Ahtik, J., Košak, K., Muck, D., Tomc, H. G., & Kočevar, T. N. (2022). 3D digital preservation, presentation, and interpretation of wooden cultural heritage on the example of sculptures of the FormaViva Kostanjevica na Krki Collection. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178445
- Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. (2021). Virtual reality and tourism marketing: Conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(11), 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
