Collaborative Online International Learning: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Narratives from the Metaverse
Abstract
The metaverse is a digitally created virtual world that can be explored through extended reality, allowing individuals to engage with one another using avatars. As the metaverse becomes more widely used, it is becoming increasingly important to comprehend its impact on individuals and society. This paper presents a case where the metaverse was used to evaluate collaborative online international learning (COIL) activities while empowering participants by showcasing their creativity as contributors to the open educational resources collective through virtual exhibits. The exhibitors were participants in a COIL initiative involving online activities that aimed to facilitate cross-cultural exchanges and global learning among universities in three countries: the USA, Japan, and the Philippines. Data collected from 82 virtual exhibits in the metaverse were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, revealing benefits related to cultural exchange, personal growth, and positive learning experiences. Furthermore, reflections collected from the virtual exhibits were more profound and expressive than text-based platforms, suggesting that creative processes in visually stimulating environments like the metaverse could promote critical and out-of-the-box thinking among individuals.
Received Date: April 9, 2024
Revised Date: May 22, 2024
Accepted Date: June 5, 2024
References
- Anzai, Y., & Shimizu, H. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of COIL for foreign language education. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 16(2), 46-54.
- Appiah-Kubi, P., & Annan, E. (2020). A review of a collaborative online international learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(1).
- Bell, S. (2018). The metaverse: What it is, where to find it, who will build it, and fortnite. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 11(3).
- Brown, M., O'Hare, G. M., & Donnelly, R. (2020). Augmented and virtual reality in the classroom. In Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (pp. 1–10). Springer.
- Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412.
- David, E. J. R., & Okazaki, S. (2006). Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(1), 1–16.
- David, E. J. R., & Okazaki, S. (2010). Activation and automaticity of colonial mentality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 850-887.
- Diem, H. T. T., Thinh, M. P., & Mung, T. T. (2023). An investigation into the benefits and challenges of international student exchange programs: Perspectives from student teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7), 258-280.
- Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 3-12). Sage.
- Elliott-Gower, S., & Hill, K. W. (2015). The Soliya connect program: Two institutions' experience with virtual intercultural. eJournal of Public Affairs, 4(1), 114-127.
- Ikeda, K. (2022). Emergence of COIL as online international education before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 1–5.
- Ji, L. J., Zhang, Z., Usborne, E., & Guan, Y. (2004). Optimism across cultures: In response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 25-34.
- Komatsu, T. (2023). Collaborative online international learning (COIL) during the pandemic: The momentum for developing global competency through equitable, partnership-based intercultural learning. In Internationalization and imprints of the pandemic on higher education worldwide (pp. 209–228). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Mangubat, L., Dancalan, J., Habito, C., & Figueroa Jr., R. (2024). Presence and situational interest of participants of a virtual art exhibit in the metaverse: The case of Galeria Sinag. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business, 6(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v6i1.133
- Marciniak, D., & Winnicki, M. (2019). International student exchange–motives, benefits and barriers of participation. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 113, 51-61.
- Moore, M. G. (1997). Quality in distance education: Four cases. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526969
- Rubin, J. (2017). Embedding collaborative online international learning (COIL) at higher education institutions. Internationalisation of Higher Education, 2, 27–44.
- Vahed, A., & Rodriguez, K. (2021). Enriching students' engaged learning experiences through the collaborative online international learning project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 596-605.
- Wimpenny, K., Finardi, K. R., Orsini-Jones, M., & Jacobs, L. (2022). Knowing, being, relating and expressing through third space global South-North COIL: Digital inclusion and equity in international higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 279–296.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
